Building Materials & Real Estate

Surveying drone strikes Manchester tower crane despite obstacle avoidance

Halvard LindstromNovember 12, 20265 min read1 views

At a glance

  • An AAIB bulletin records that the aircraft hit a crane top and fell 120 m at a Cheetham Hill construction site, with the contractor's internal review pointing to a limited understanding of the avoidance software.
  • A survey drone flying a pre-set path over an urban construction site in Cheetham Hill, Manchester, struck the top of a tower crane and fell 120 m despite having obstacle avoidance enabled. The incident was reported to the AAIB but not formally investigated, and the contractor's internal review found its staff may not have understood the software's limitations.
Concept illustration of a surveying drone hovering beside the jib of a tower crane above an urban construction site at dusk.

A surveying drone struck the top of a tower crane and fell 120 m to the ground while working over a construction site in the Cheetham Hill area of Manchester, the Air Accidents Investigation Branch has disclosed.

The incident happened in August and was notified to the AAIB, but no formal investigation was launched. Neither the site nor the contractor involved has been identified.

Pre-set flight path

In its latest bulletin, the AAIB said the unmanned aircraft was carrying out an aerial survey on a pre-selected flight path over a construction site in an urban area. Its obstacle avoidance feature was enabled, yet the aircraft still struck the top of the crane and dropped 120 m.

An internal investigation by the construction company concluded that the company and its remote pilots "may not have fully understood the limitations of the obstacle avoidance software", according to the bulletin.

Reported, not investigated

With no formal probe opened, the bulletin records the occurrence as it was reported rather than setting out findings on causes. The internal review's conclusion is the only explanation of the sequence of events given in the published account.

The case turns on the distance between switching on an automated avoidance function and knowing when that function's performance falls short — a distinction that matters for survey flights close to tall structures in built-up areas.

Reported by Halvard Lindstrom, Crushing, Drilling and Piling Analyst.